REAL ID Microscopic Tag Be Implanted

Search the Congressional Record for the term "Microscopic Tag". Joe Biden declared that a Microscopic Tag will be implanted into every American and the SCOTUS will rule on this in the future. "Mark my words" were the words used by Joe Biden in 2005 and again in 2006.

Four Horseman documentary by Renegade, Inc. We are living in the Age of Decadence which historically has been the final stage of an empire before its decline.

Since World War II, we have been living through the age of the American Empire. Throughout the years, the U.S. has built the largest military, created a powerful industry, was at the forefront of innovation, amassed great wealth, and exerted that dominance on the rest of the world. It’s been a good run.

However, the reality is all empires eventually end. There is a natural entropy to them. Over time, empires rise, degrade, and eventually fall into chaos and fail. Many Americans have not yet grasped the possibility of the end of America’s supremacy.

Perhaps a question every American should ask themselves is, are we already living through the fall of the American Empire?

The modern day Four Horsemen continue to ride roughshod over the people who can least afford it. Crises are converging when governments, religion and mainstream economists have stalled. 23 international thinkers come together and break their silence about how the world really works and why there is still hope in re-establishing a moral and just society. Four Horsemen is free from mainstream media propaganda, doesn't bash bankers, criticize politicians or get involved in conspiracy theories. The film ignites the debate about how we usher a new economic paradigm into the world which, globally, would dramatically improve the quality of life for billions. This will require every human on earth to be implanted with a Microscopic Tag.

Sep 15, 2005 — ... microscopic tag be implanted in a person's body to track his every movement? There is actual discussion about that. You will rule on that ...confirmation hearing on the nomination of john g. roberts, jr ...

Senate Committee on the Judiciary (.gov) 

judiciary.senate.gov

Sep 15, 2005 — ... microscopic tag be implanted in a person's body to track his every movement? There is actual discussion about that. You will rule on that ...

1,452 pages

Claimed by: social media users

Search congress.gov for "microscopic tag be implanted"

Google: "Microscopic Tag Be Implanted" site:.gov

We will be faced with equally consequential decisions in the 21st
century. Can a microscopic tag be implanted in a person’s body to
track his every movement? There is actual discussion about that.
You will rule on that, mark my words, before your tenure is over. Can brain scans be used to determine whether a person is inclined toward criminality or violent behavior? You will rule on that. And, Judge, I need to know whether you will be a Justice who believes that the constitutional journey must continue to speak to these consequential decisions, or that we have gone far enough in protecting against Government intrusion into our autonomy, into the most personal decisions we make. Judge, that is why this is a critical moment. There are elected officials in this Government, such as Mr. DeLay, a fine, honorable, patriotic man, and others, who have been unsuccessful in implementing their agenda in the elected branches, so they have now poured their energies—as the left would—they have now poured their energy and resources into trying to change the Court’s view of the Constitution, and now they have a once-ina-lifetime opportunity, the filling of two Supreme Court vacancies, one of which is the Chief, and the other is for Associate Justice, the first time that has happened in 75 years.

Augustin Carstens, General Manager at the Bank for International Settlements made the some comments in an IMF sponsored video about central bank digital currencies:

Point number one is this. He was giving a talk at an IMF payment conference and was asked about CBDCs. He explained three things: First of all, the central bank digital currency (a cryptocurrency from the central banks) is not your money. He called it an expression of central bank liability. In other words, it’s theirs, not yours.

Point number two is they can set the rules of how you can use it. So, if you are in Knoxville and want to drive to Nashville, and they decide that you shouldn’t be able to drive to Nashville, you can’t buy gas outside of the area that they want you to buy gas. Or if you want to buy chocolate and they decide that chocolate is not good for you, you can’t buy chocolate with your central bank digital currency. He then explained that they can set the rules of how you can use their money.

Please attend the Common Law Academy every Wednesday at 7:00 PM New York time at URL meetn.com/cla

The third thing he said is that they have the digital tools to enforce the rules. So that means that if they want to raise taxes and take it out of your account, they can and will: Our analysis of CBDC, in particular for general use, is we intend to establish the equivalence with cash, and there is a huge difference there. For example, in cash, we don’t know who is using a $100 bill today. We don’t know who is using a 1,000-peso bill today. A key difference with the CBDC is that the central bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability. Also, we will have the technology to enforce that. Those two issues are extremely important, which makes a huge difference regarding what cash is.

The benefit of a retail CBDC for the state

Augustin Carstens, General Manager at the Bank for International Settlements made the following comments in an IMF sponsored video about central bank digital currencies:

“We intend to establish the equivalence with cash, but there is a huge difference there. For example, with cash we don’t know who is using a $100 bill today, we don’t know who is using a MX $1,000 bill today.

"Determine the use of that expression of central bank liability"

"A key difference with a CBDC is that a central bank will have absolute control under the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability, and we will have the technology to enforce that. Those two issues are extremely important and make a huge difference with respect to what cash is.” 

Clearly, the attraction to Carstens is that CBDCs offer the potential for central banks to increase their controls over how currency is used, control not only over markets and economies, but over individuals and businesses. Carstens seems completely unfazed by the issues for personal liberty. However, Figure 1 above suggests there is an option of token based CBDCs to provide anonymity. But given all central banks’ desire for control to minimise criminal transactions and tax evasion, it is unlikely that anonymity will be preserved. And for any jurisdiction where personal freedom might be regarded as important, there’s always the pull of international conformity to ensure that in the name of preventing international fraud and tax evasion personal freedom cannot be protected.

The issue of individual freedom to buy and sell goods and services with the state being automatically informed of every transaction is a huge departure from using banknotes and coin. This could become an impediment to the widespread adoption and success of a retail CBDC in some countries. But for individuals there may be no option if retail CBDCs become the pretext to do away with cash entirely.

Furthermore, while some central banks will be wary of a CBDC interfering with the implementation of monetary policy, other central banks have expressed the desire to use them to extend control over economic outcomes. For example, by deploying CBDCs with an expiry date beyond which they become worthless, it would enable a central bank to accelerate capital spending, employment expansion, or consumer demand in favoured industries, such as green energy, or other sectors deemed worthy of state promotion and protection.

The application of positive and negative interest rates selectively on retail CBDCs might be seen as a further tool for enhancing monetary policies by directing capital investment and economic management. This, surely, is one of several possibilities that will excite the planners as CBDC concepts develop.

That is in the future. For now, the CBDC concept needs to be consistent with promoting improved settlement options. Through commercial bank reserves, central banks supply the ultimate backstop for the banking system, and in respect of settlements generally, they offer guarantees of safety, integrity and access to currency and deposits. Central banks are also tasked with providing sufficient liquidity to ensure the smooth workings of the payments system, ultimately as the lender of last resort. Through their banking regulation, central banks oversee the integrity and efficiency of their national settlement systems.

The introduction of a CBDC must not undermine these functions but be seen to enhance them.

"A liability of the central bank"

Despite the claims, a CBDC is not “cash for the digitalised world.” Yes, like cash, a CBDC would be a liability of the central bank. However, unlike cash, a CBDC would offer neither the privacy protections nor the finality that cash provides.

First, on the issue of privacy, a CBDC would be a radical departure from cash. When I present a five-dollar bill to someone for payment, we are the only ones who truly know the transaction’s details. Maybe a person nearby saw the transaction, but they are unlikely to know just how much money I handed off. It’s even more unlikely that they know the serial number of the note that I handed over. And unless they know me well, they are unlikely to know my name and address.

In contrast, central bankers—including Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, Bank for International Settlements General Manager Agustín Carstens, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, and Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey—have openly and repeatedly said that anonymity and complete privacy would not be an option with a CBDC. To share just one example, President Lagarde said, “When we surveyed Europeans, the first concern that they had … was privacy. Privacy is first and foremost on their mind when we divvy up the digital euro. [But] there would not be complete anonymity as there is with [cash.]”

We the People

American Constitution Society | ACS

Please attend the Common Law Academy every Wednesday at 7:00 PM New York time at URL meetn.com/cla

Constitution Week

Remote Interviewing and Onboarding Best Practices

2021-2022 Clubs & Organizations – 

Officer/Advisor Manual

Join the Weekly Video Call

Call 305-333-1925