Step 1. Legal Notice
Notice of Violation
William Jackson
Last Update 3 months ago
Step 1
Affidavits are sent to the public officer whose unconstitutional actions have
perjured his oath, violated the Constitution(s) and violated the rights of the
people who were damaged by his actions. Affidavits can also be sent to Corporation Officers whose unconstitutional actions have harmed the community. When the Affidavit recipient(s) fail to rebut, in kind, then, go to step 2.
Do you want to reach out in a friendly way to your local candidate or your
existing elected or selected representative to find out if they follow the Constitution?
Presumptive Affidavit
Do This
Send a sworn affidavit. Instructions presented in our next Video Call. How to send a Presumptive Affidavit. Join the Citizens of the American Constitution Workshop Video Call.
Letter.01
Certified Letter
Merrick B. Garland
Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington DC 20530
Presumptive Letter and Affidavit/Declaration of Truth
Attention Mr. Garland,
I, Dr. Frederick David Graves, American Justice Foundation® 19420 Heritage Harbor Parkway Lutz, Florida 33558. Questions? Call 866-LAW-EASY,
the undersigned, make this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth of my own free will, and I hereby affirm, declare and swear, under my oath, that I am of legal age and of sound mind and hereby attest that the information contained in this Affidavit/Declaration is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
This letter is lawful notification to you, pursuant to The Bill of Rights to the National Constitution, in particular, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Ninth Amendments, and Constitution of the State of Florida Article 1: Declaration of Rights, Section 1 - 27 and Constitution of the State of Florida Article 2 General Provisions, Section 5(b): Public Officers and Constitution of the State of Florida Article 6 Suffrage and Elections, Section 3: Oath, and pursuant to your oath, and requires your written response to me specific to the subject matter. Your failure to respond, within 30 days, as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity, everything in this letter with which you disagree is your lawful, legal and binding agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this letter is true, correct, legal, lawful and binding upon you, in any court, anywhere in America, without your protest or objection or that of those who represent you. Your silence is your acquiescence. See: Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391. Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law.” Also, see: U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.”
Are you an enemy of the 1787 Constitution? Please reply. We would like to know if you are an elected official who follows the 1787 Constitution.
Basis of Law and Facts in this Presumptive Affidavit of Complaint:
1. The Constitution for the United States of America is the Supreme Law of the land and supersedes all other lesser law, statutes, codes, regulations, ordinances and the State Constitution.
2. What is written in the referenced national Constitution is valid, authorized and enforceable. What is not written in the national Constitution is prohibited by that Constitution.
3. Article I, Section 1 of the national Constitution vests all legislative power in Congress. The Constitution does not authorize legislative power in any form to the Executive and Judicial Branches.
4. Article I, Section 10 of the national Constitution declares No State shall make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.
5. Article III, Section 2 of the national Constitution and Article IV, Section 4 guarantees to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and also, Article VI, Clause 2-3 of the national Constitution declares All Americans are guaranteed a Constitutional Republic.
6. When the State Legislature creates law for the people, that law must be constitutionally compliant specific to the Bill of Rights or it is not valid law binding upon the people.
7. A law must be valid to exist and must exist to be lawfully enforced.
8. All elected and appointed public officials who serve the people, including you, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice, are required to take an Oath of Office to support and defend the Constitution before assuming office.
9. Any act passed by any legislature and any action committed by any public officer either supports and upholds the Constitutions, national and state, or opposes and violates them. No public officer has the constitutional authority—or any other form of valid, lawful authority—to oppose and violate the very documents to which s/he swore or affirmed his or her oath.
10. Any unconstitutional actions committed by any public officers, including you, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice, invoke the self-executing Sections 3, 4 & 5 of the 14th Amendment, by which the errant public officers immediately vacate their offices, upon commission of their crimes, can no longer hold public office and forfeit all benefits thereof, including salary and pension.
11. Executive orders are not authorized in the national Constitution, therefore are prohibited by the national Constitution.
12. The national Constitution and the Supreme Court recognize and protect the right to interstate travel. The travel right entails privacy and free domestic movement without governmental abridgement.
13. From Title 7-Government Organization and employees, Part III-Employees, Subpart B-Empooyment and Retention, Chapter 33-Examination, Selection and Placement, Subchapter II-Oath of Office: An individual, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit, shall take the following oath, 5 USC §3331. Oath of office. Please provide your Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number for the court.
If you disagree with anything in this letter, then rebut, in kind, that
with which you disagree, in writing, with particularity, to me, within 30
days of this letter’s date, and support your disagreement with evidence,
fact and law. Your failure to respond, as stipulated, is your agreement
with and admission to the fact that everything in this letter is true,
correct, legal, lawful, and is your irrevocable agreement attesting to this,
fully binding upon you, in any court in America, without your protest or
objection and that of those who represent you.
All Rights Reserved,
Dr. Frederick David Graves
Full Printed Name, Affiant
Notary Statement
In the State of ________________
County of _________________
I swear that on this ____ day of __________________, the above named Affiant/Declarant,
_____________________, appeared before me, and, of his own free will, signed this Affidavit of Complaint.
__________________________________
Notary Public Seal:
My Commission Expires:______________ Date:
References
Oath of Office
files.floridados.gov/media/702653/dsde56-oath-acceptance-sept-2023.pdf
Constitution
files.floridados.gov/media/693801/florida-constitution.pdf
END OF COPY
Brief Summary
BRIEF SUMMARY OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL METHODS
Since the Constitution for the United States of America, circa
1787, as amended in 1791 with The Bill of Rights, is the declared
Supreme Law of America, we and followers of our Constitutionally based methods have enforced the Constitutions upon reluctant
government officers and judges for many years. All of our methods are
outlined on our website, and we would encourage you to review
them. This section will give a very brief synopsis of these methods.
As previously stated, anytime we have concern with government
or corporate America, we write what is called a presumptive letter, in
which we make the presumption that everything we claim and charge is
true and correct, unless specifically rebutted, with particularity, by the
letter recipient(s). The letter contains two "presumptive paragraphs",
presented first and last, which contain a lawful notification warning the
recipient(s) that, if they do not respond and rebut that with which they
disagree, then, they admit to all charges and claims made in the letter(s),
fully binding upon them in any court, without their protest, objection or
that of those who represent them. Lawful notification is the first
essential of due process of law.
The body of the letter(s) contains all the specific charges and
claims we made against the offending government or corporate
officer(s). Other presumptive letters are sent to all supervisory and
oversight personnel within that jurisdiction or within that chain of
command. The intent is to notify everyone who should be notified, so
that someone will take action to remedy the problem. The purpose of
the letter(s) is to resolve the problem administratively and
Constitutionally, before it goes further and probably requires for court
action. It is obvious to anyone who has dealt in these matters that the
2
courts in this nation are corrupt and rife with fraud. Thus, it is best to
strive to resolve the matter before one must resort to court action.
The time limit we allow for the recipients’ response is always
thirty (30) days, and if no response is made within that time period, we
usually wait another ten (10) days and then send an Affidavit of Truth to
all letter recipients. The Affidavit has three basic components: (1)
lawful notification to the recipients that, by their failure to respond to the
letter, or if a meaningless, non-specific response was made, they admit
to and agree with all charges and claims made in that letter, fully binding
upon them in any court, without their protest, objection or that of those
who represent them, meaning, of course, their attorneys; (2) a list of
some of the charges and claims made in the letter to which they have
admitted; (3) a challenge to the recipients to rebut our Affidavit with
their own sworn, notarized affidavits, certifying that their affidavit is
based in fact, law, truth and valid evidence, under the pains and penalties
of perjury under the laws of the United States of America. In over fifty
(50) years of doing this, we have written thousands of affidavits, and no
one has responded with a rebuttal affidavit. This is easy to understand,
since we are based in truth, fact, law and valid evidence, all founded in
and supported by the Supreme Law of the Land. Clearly, it is
impossible for any public officer, pursuant to his oath, to rebut truth,
fact, law and valid evidence, by means of his own sworn and notarized
affidavit.
If there is no response to our Affidavits, within thirty (30) days, we
wait another ten (10) days or so, then, record our Affidavits with the
county clerk-recorder to place them on the public record. Should the
matter eventually end up in court, we have supportive documents which,
pursuant to both state and federal rules of evidence, are considered "selfauthenticating"; thus, admissible in court as evidence against our
opponents and with which we can invoke "estoppel by acquiescence" to
bar our opponents from making defenses against issues to which they
have already admitted. We send copies of the recorded instruments to
3
our opponents, so that they know we are totally serious and ready to go
to court and invoke rules of evidence, if necessary.
If our opponents do not respond to the copies of the recorded
Affidavits and if we are the moving party in the action, namely, the
Plaintiff, then, we send a Notice of Suit to our opponents. This Notice is
the last step in the administrative and Constitutional process to resolve
the issue before having to go to court. As Defendants, we obviously do
not send a Notice of Suit, and wait until the resolution of the matter,
before it goes to court, or ready ourselves for court action as
Defendants.
By and through this process, we have achieved the following: (1)
our positions are supported by our Affidavits, recorded on the public
record, self-authenticating and admissible in court; (2) our opponents
have tacitly admitted to our positions by failing to rebut them, pursuant
to the cautions in our lawful notifications to them; (3) since the
opponents admit to our charges and agree they will present no defense to
them in court, if they then attempt a defense against our charges, we
charge them with putting fraud upon the court; (4) we invoke positions
of estoppel by acquiescence, by which our opponents cannot defend
against their prior admissions; (5) since the court only convenes to hear
matters in controversy, and there is no controversy for the court to hear,
due to our opponents’ prior admissions, victory lawfully should be
ours. On a scorecard of 1 to 100, our score is 100 and our opponents’
score is zero.
In the rare case, opponents may state that they have no duty or
requirement to respond to the letters or the affidavits. We disagree, and
so do the Constitutions. Public officers are required to take oaths of
office. The oath is required by the national Constitution, state
Constitution, federal law, state law, and sometimes, county and local
law. Therefore, it is well established, lawfully and legally, that the oath
is Constitutionally and statutorily required – no exceptions! Thus,
pursuant to their oaths, public officers must abide by the Constitutions in
4
the performance of their official duties. The oath is given in exchange
for the Public Trust, and the oath taker is lawfully bound to uphold the
Public Trust. The First Amendment guarantees the Right of free speech
and the Right to petition government for redress of grievances, which,
the oath taker, pursuant to his oath, is mandated to uphold. If he fails
this requirement, then, he has violated two provisions of the First
Amendment, the Public Trust and perjured his oath. Further, by not
responding and/or not rebutting, the oath taker denies the Citizen
remedy, thus, denies the Citizen Constitutional due process of law, as
stated within the Bill of Rights. An American Citizen can expect, and
has the Right and duty to demand, that his government officers uphold
their oaths to the Constitution(s) and abide by all Constitutionally
imposed mandates of their oaths. This is an un-enumerated Right
guaranteed in the Ninth Amendment. No oath taker has the authority to
defy and deny the very document to which he swore his oath and to
which he owes his limited, delegated authority. The oath taker must act
within the lawful scope of his duties and authority. Pursuant to the
delegation of powers clause, within the Tenth Amendment, no power is
delegated to any oath taker to deny, defy, or oppose the very document
to which he swore his oath.
In light of the foregoing, there is no legitimate argument to support
the claim that oath takers are not required to respond to letters, which, in
this case, act as petitions for redress of grievances, stating complaints,
charges and claims made against them by their constituents or by
Citizens injured by their actions. The Declaration of Independence
requires all Citizens to oppose all enemies of this Republic, foreign and
domestic. When public officers harm the Citizens by their errant
actions, and then refuse to respond to or rebut petitions from Citizens,
then, those public officers are domestic enemies, acting in sedition and
insurrection to the declared Law of the land and must be opposed,
exposed and lawfully removed from office.
As previously stated, the purpose of the presumptive letters and
affidavits is to resolve problems before it becomes necessary to go to
5
court. However, once the matter comes before the court, we use
Constitutional Court Challenges from the very inception of the court
action. We support everything we do with the Supreme Law of the
Land, and when we get to court, this is very difficult for anyone to
lawfully oppose. When the judge convenes court, he usually asks the
attorney for the opponent if he is ready to proceed, and then asks us if
we are ready to proceed. We then state: "No, we are not, since there are
several matters we need to clarify before we go further." The person
acting as judge usually says: "Go right ahead." We then immediately
say: "You and the prosecuting attorney have sworn oaths of office to
support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America and
the Constitution of the state of…. Is that correct?" In our court
appearances, the judge says, "Yes." This response binds not only him,
but also the opposing attorney to their respective oaths. We then
state: "With all due respect, you and the opposing attorney are required
to abide by those oaths in the performance of your official duties,
especially those before this Honorable Court. Is this correct?" When we
receive two affirmative answers to these two confirming questions for
our prior statements, then, we have brought the court under the authority
of the Constitution, by holding the judge and opposing counsel to their
oaths.
If the Citizen before the court understands what he has
accomplished and how he can protect himself Constitutionally, and if he
can articulately advocate his Constitutional argument(s), then, he has a
much greater chance of a successful outcome. To do this, one must be
well vested in the Constitution(s) and know how to competently and
convincingly present his Constitutionally-based positions. While using
the Constitution is not a guarantee of success, not using it is almost a
guarantee of failure. Our Constitutional Court Challenges are on our
website and provide additional information, including how we would
proceed should the judge respond in a negative fashion. Basically, if the
judge tries to avoid confirming his and the opposing counsel’s oaths and
duties thereunder, we politely inform him that the confirmation of the
oath and adherence thereto are required to assure the Citizen’s Rights are
6
upheld, including, but not limited to, all aspects of due process of
law. We would then say that, by his evasion and reluctance to confirm
his oath, it appears he either has no oath or does not intend to abide by
it. Therefore, it is unlikely he will uphold our Rights and due process of
law, so we would then state: "You are disqualified, sir; step
down." Every Citizen has the Right to disqualify a judge, especially one
who refuses to confirm his oath and his sworn duties thereunder.
Prior to appearing in court, we file several Constitutionally based
motions, including a Motion to Claim and Exercise Constitutional
Rights, which would be very difficult for any judge, pursuant to this
oath, to deny. Because of our opponents’ prior admissions, which are on
the public record; thus, very difficult for any judge or opposing attorney
to ignore, we could also file a motion for a declaratory judgment on
those admissions, and, if necessary, a subsequent motion to enforce
estoppel by acquiescence. Both of these make it very obvious and put it
on the court record that our opponents have admitted to all of our claims
and charges, and to deny this would be impossible. This does not mean
our opponents cannot advocate their positions or defend themselves, but
they cannot do so on the points to which they have previously
admitted. Since our presumptive letters and our affidavits cover all
salient points at issue and in controversy, there is virtually nothing
remaining for our opponents to argue or defend.
The Constitutional Court Challenges also specifies our status to the
court and how we lawfully appear before that court. The confirmation
of the oaths and our status are very important. If we appear as
Defendants, and if we know that the charges alleged against us are
invalid and without any substance, then, right after the status statement,
we make a verbal motion to dismiss the charges alleged against us
because they are fraudulent, bogus, and without substance. If the
opposing counsel objects, then, we respectfully demand, by and through
the judge, that the opposing counsel certify the charges, as valid, lawful
and Constitutionally compliant, specific to the Bill of Rights, by means
of his own sworn, notarized Affidavit, so attesting, under the pains and
7
penalties of perjury of the laws of the United States of America. In the
rare instance in which this needs to be done, there is usually an
immediate conference among the judge, the opposing counsel and us,
and the charges alleged against us miraculously disappear for, of course,
some convenient, but obscure, "reason". No prosecuting attorney would
ever execute such an affidavit and no court can lawfully hear and
adjudicate bogus, fraudulent charges.
Jack and Margy Flynn
Instructions
1. Our presumptive letter is the first part of a process intended to
HONORABLY resolve a matter before it goes further and/or proceeds to
court.
2. Our intent is to stay away from court and government agencies, by
honorably resolving this matter, since very few people have the
capability of successfully arguing valid Constitutional grounds in the
present corrupt
American court system.
3. This type of letter has two presumptive paragraphs, first and
last. These paragraphs contain lawful notice and warning to the letter
recipient that the claims and charges we make in the letter must be
rebutted within 30 days of receipt and that his failure to rebut is his
admission to all of the claims and charges we make.
4. Between the first and last presumptive paragraphs, we make our
charges and claims, all of which we fully base only in truth, fact, valid
law and evidence. The charges and claims we make against the letter
recipient are made pursuant to his unconstitutional, unlawful, deceptive
actions.
5. The charges and claims we make must simply and directly, and as
efficiently as possible, state the “Who, What, Where, When, Why and
How” of the unlawful actions committed by the letter recipient and how
those actions specifically harmed us, pursuant to oaths taken by public
officers.
6. As stated, we base our claims and charges ONLY in truth, fact, law
and evidence, which, again, are honorably intended to effectively and
quickly resolve this matter. Our charges, so based, are extremely
2
difficult, if not impossible, for the letter recipient to rebut, then, support
his rebuttal with truth, fact, valid law and evidence.
7. Since most letter recipients cannot truthfully and lawfully rebut our
claims and charges, usually they do not do so, or if they respond, usually
do not rebut our specific charges and claims. In either case, the letter
recipient, pursuant to the lawful notification contained in the
presumptive paragraphs, admits to all of our charges and claims, fully
binding upon him in any court, without his protest, objection or that of
those who represent him. Words have lawful and legal
meanings. When the letter recipient admits to our charges and claims,
when he has a duty to respond, but fails to do so, his admission to our
charges looms very large in any lawful court proceedings.
8. The time limit provided in the presumptive paragraph is 30 days
from receipt of the letter. If we do not receive a written response within
that time period, we usually wait a few extra days, and then, we send the
letter recipient our sworn and notarized affidavit, which is the second
step in our process.
Presumptive Letter
DRAFT
This is the first “presumptive” paragraph. It should be used as the
first paragraph of your letters:
This letter is lawful notification to you, pursuant to The Bill of
Rights to the National Constitution, in particular, the First, Fourth, Fifth,
Sixth and Ninth Amendments, and The Bill of Rights of the New
Mexico Constitution, in particular, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 17 and 18, and
pursuant to your oath, and requires your written response to me specific
to the subject matter. Your failure to respond, within 30 days, as
stipulated, and rebut, with particularity, everything in this letter with
which you disagree is your lawful, legal and binding agreement with and
admission to the fact that everything in this letter is true, correct, legal,
lawful and binding upon you, in any court, anywhere in America,
without your protest or objection or that of those who represent you.
Your silence is your acquiescence. See: Connally v. General
Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391. Notification of legal responsibility
is “the first essential of due process of law.” Also, see: U.S. v. Tweel,
550 F. 2d. 297. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a
legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would
be intentionally misleading.”
IN THE MIDDLE, MAKE ALL OF YOUR STATEMENTS OF
ALL THE FACTS REGARDING THE ACTIONS TAKEN
AGAINST YOU BY THE COP, DA, JUDGE, ETC.
THEN INSERT THIS FINAL “PRESUMPTIVE” PARAGRAPH
AS THE LAST PARAGRAPH OF YOUR LETTERS.
2
If you disagree with anything in this letter, then rebut, in kind, that
with which you disagree, in writing, with particularity, to me, within 30
days of this letter’s date, and support your disagreement with evidence,
fact and law. Your failure to respond, as stipulated, is your agreement
with and admission to the fact that everything in this letter is true,
correct, legal, lawful, and is your irrevocable agreement attesting to this,
fully binding upon you, in any court in America, without your protest or
objection and that of those who represent you.
All Rights Reserved,
Your Printed Name
DRAFT Affidavit of Formal Complaint
1
EXHIBIT TWENTY ONE
Affidavit of Formal Complaint
To: ___________________________________ , (Law enforcement officer)
Title and full address
I,_________________________________, the undersigned, hereinafter, Affiant, domiciled at
__________________________________________________, hereby make this Affidavit of
Complaint of my own free will, and I hereby affirm, declare and swear, under my oath, that I am
of legal age and of sound mind and hereby attest that the information contained in this Affidavit
of Complaint is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
I file this Affidavit of Complaint with _________________________________, in his capacity
as a law enforcement officer, against the unconstitutional actions committed by
__________________________________.
Basis of Law and Facts in this Affidavit of Complaint:
1. The Constitution for the United States of America is the Supreme Law of the land and
supersedes all other lesser law, statutes, codes, regulations and the State Constitution.
2. What is written in the referenced national Constitution is valid, authorized and
enforceable. What is not written in the national Constitution is prohibited by that
Constitution.
3. Article I, Section 1 of the national Constitution vests all legislative power in Congress.
The Constitution does not authorize legislative power in any form to the Executive and
Judicial Branches.
4. When the State Legislature creates law for the people, that law must be constitutionally
compliant specific to the Bill of Rights or it is not valid law binding upon the people.
5. A law must be valid to exist and must exist to be lawfully enforced.
6. All elected and appointed public officials who serve the people, including you,
_________________________, are required to take an Oath of Office to support and
defend the Constitution before assuming office.
7. Any act passed by any legislature and any action committed by any public officer either
supports and upholds the Constitutions, national and state, or opposes and violates them.
No public officer has the constitutional authority—or any other form of valid, lawful
2
authority—to oppose and violate the very documents to which s/he swore or affirmed his
or her oath.
8. Any unconstitutional actions committed by any public officers, including you,
__________________________, invoke the self-executing Sections 3 & 4 of the 14th
Amendment, by which the errant public officers immediately vacate their offices, upon
commission of their crimes, can no longer hold public office and forfeit all benefits
thereof, including salary and pension.
9. Executive orders are not authorized in the national Constitution, therefore are prohibited
by the national Constitution.
Complaint:
The Affiant has previously sent an Affidavit/Declaration of Truth to
_____________________________, who by his actions, perjured his oath, violated and opposed
the Constitution(s), the inherent rights and due process of law guaranteed to the people therein,
and by those actions caused harm to the people, in the instant case, me. In the Affidavit,
_______________________ was provided a lawful warning to rebut in kind the charges and
claims made in the Affidavit, supported by truth, fact, valid law and evidence.
____________________ failed to rebut Affiant’s Affidavit, in kind, by means of his own sworn,
notarized Affidavit, supported by truth, fact, valid law and evidence, within the specified time
limit, therefore, _________________________ tacitly admitted to and agreed with all of the
charges, claims, averments and information contained in the referenced Affidavit. See: Connally
v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391. Notification of legal responsibility is “the first
essential of due process of law.” See: U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297. “Silence can only be
equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left
unanswered would be intentionally misleading.”
This Affidavit of Complaint calls for the immediate removal and arrest of
________________________ whose unconstitutional actions and violations of secured rights
and due process of law are fully described and enumerated in the attached Affidavit/Declaration
of Truth sent to __________________________ on date, which Affidavit/Declaration is
incorporated herein and made part hereof. Pursuant to your oath and the constitutional mandates
imposed upon you thereby, you must act lawfully to remove from office and arrest
_________________________, since you cannot lawfully uphold, support, excuse, and condone
the unconstitutional actions ___________________________ has committed, and to which
actions he has admitted.
Further, Affiant sent Affidavits to the oversight and supervisory personnel of
_____________________ in which Affiant clearly stated that __________________________
committed unconstitutional actions that violated and denied guaranteed rights and due process of
law, which actions harmed the people, in the instant case, me. As stated in the Affidavits sent to
these oversight and supervisory personnel, they were notified that they are required, pursuant to
3
their oaths, to stop and correct the unconstitutional actions committed by
_______________________, under their watch, and remove ________________________ from
office. The Affidavits further stated that if they failed to so act, then, they support, abet and
condone ____________________________’s actions committed under their supervision.
Therefore, by their unconstitutional support of __________________________ and his
unconstitutional actions, the supervisory and oversight personnel have invoked the self-executing
Sections 3 & 4 of the 14th Amendment, thus, have lawfully vacated their offices and forfeited
any benefits thereof, including salaries and pensions. This Affidavit of Complaint calls for the
removal from office of _________________________ and the supervisory and oversight
personnel who were so notified by Affiant. The supervisory and oversight personnel failed to
rebut Affiant’s Affidavits sent to them, therefore, tacitly admitted to and agreed with all of the
charges, claims, averments and information contained therein. A copy of the Affidavits sent to
the supervisory and oversight personnel are attached to this Affidavit of Complaint and made
part hereof.
You, _____________________________, pursuant to your oath, must abide by that oath
in the performance of your official duties and must lawfully act upon this Affidavit of Complaint
filed by an American injured and damaged by the unconstitutional actions of the recipients of the
Affidavits specified herein. If you fail your constitutional duty and your oath, then, YOU will
also step outside the lawful scope of your limited, delegated duties and authority and will have
invoked the referenced self-executing Sections 3 & 4 of the 14th Amendment, specified above.
Affiant further sayeth naught.
All Rights Reserved,
By__________________________________
Full Printed Name, Affiant
Notary Statement
In the State of ________________
County of _________________
I swear that on this ____ day of __________________, the above named Affiant/Declarant,
_____________________, appeared before me, and, of his own free will, signed this Affidavit of
Complaint.
__________________________________
Notary Public Seal:
4
My Commission Expires:______________ Date:
BREAK
AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH
I, Full Name and address, the undersigned, make this Affidavit/Declaration
of Truth of my own free will, and I hereby affirm, declare and swear, under my
oath, that I am of legal age and of sound mind and hereby attest that the
information contained in this Affidavit/Declaration is true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
This Affidavit/Declaration of Truth is lawful notification you, and is hereby made
and sent to you pursuant to the Federal Constitution, specifically, the Bill of
Rights, in particular, Amendments I, IV, V, VI, VII, IX and X, and The Bill of
Rights of the New Mexico Constitution, in particular, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 17
and 18, and requires your written rebuttal to me, in kind, specific to each and every
point of the subject matter stated herein, within thirty (30) days, via your own
sworn and notarized affidavit, using fact, law and evidence to support your rebuttal
of the specific subject matter stated in this Affidavit/Declaration. You are hereby
noticed that your failure to respond, as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity and
specificity, anything with which you disagree in this Affidavit/Declaration, is your
lawful, legal and binding agreement with and admission to the fact that everything
in this Affidavit/Declaration is true, correct, legal, lawful, and fully binding upon
you in any court in America, without your protest or objection and that of those
who represent you. Your silence is your acquiescence. See: Connally v. General
Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385,391. Notification of legal responsibility is “the first
essential of due process of law”. See also: U.S. V. Tweel, 550 F.2d.297. “Silence
can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or
where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.”
I, [Full Name of Affiant], hereby affirm that the following actions and
events took place:
[Make all of your true statements as to what specifically took place in your
situation in chronologically-ordered, numbered paragraphs, citing your personal
2
experiences and your personal, direct observations of others’ experiences, and/or
their actions, if this applies. The Affidavit should present your claims and charges
based upon the unlawful, unconstitutional actions committed against you by the
person to whom you are sending the affidavit and how you were damaged by the
actions. The affidavit must be based in truth, fact, valid law and evidence.]
Lawful notification has been provided to you stating that if you do not rebut,
in kind, the statements, charges and averments made in this Affidavit/Declaration,
then, you agree with and admit to them. Pursuant to that lawful notification, if you
disagree with anything stated under oath in this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth,
then rebut that with which you disagree, with particularity, within thirty (30) days
of receipt thereof, by means of your own written, notarized affidavit of truth, based
on specific, relevant fact and valid law to support your disagreement, attesting to
your rebuttal and supportive positions, as valid and lawful, under the pains and
penalties of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and this state.
An un-rebutted affidavit stands as fact and truth before any court. Your failure to
respond, as stipulated, is your agreement with and admission to the fact that
everything in this Affidavit of Truth is true, correct, legal, lawful, and is your
irrevocable admission attesting to this, fully binding upon you in any court of law
in America, without your protest, objection and that of those who represent you.
Affiant further sayeth naught.
All Rights Reserved,
____________________________________
_____________________
Full Name, Affiant/Declarant Date
NOTARY STATEMENT
In the State of Your State,
3
County of Your County
I swear that on this____day of month 2022, the above named Affiant/Declarant,
Full Name, personally appeared before me, and of his own free will, signed and
executed this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth.
_________________________________
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:______________
Seal:
Content
Merrick B. Garland
Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington DC 20530
Attention Mr. Garland,
I, Dr. Robert Levy, ADDRESS,
the undersigned, make this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth of my own free will, and I hereby affirm, declare and swear, under my oath, that I am of legal age and of sound mind and hereby attest that the information contained in this Affidavit/Declaration is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
This letter is lawful notification to you, pursuant to The Bill of
Rights to the National Constitution, in particular, the First, Fourth, Fifth,
Sixth and Ninth Amendments, and State of Florida Constitution Section 3: Oath, and pursuant to your oath, and requires your written response to me specific to the subject matter. Your failure to respond, within 30 days, as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity, everything in this letter with
which you disagree is your lawful, legal and binding agreement with and
admission to the fact that everything in this letter is true, correct, legal,
lawful and binding upon you, in any court, anywhere in America,
without your protest or objection or that of those who represent you.
Your silence is your acquiescence. See: Connally v. General
Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391. Notification of legal responsibility
is “the first essential of due process of law.” Also, see: U.S. v. Tweel,
550 F. 2d. 297. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a
legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would
be intentionally misleading.”
Basis of Law and Facts in this Affidavit of Complaint:
1. The Constitution for the United States of America is the Supreme Law of the land and supersedes all other lesser law, statutes, codes, regulations and the State Constitution.
2. What is written in the referenced national Constitution is valid, authorized and enforceable. What is not written in the national Constitution is prohibited by that Constitution.
3. Article I, Section 1 of the national Constitution vests all legislative power in Congress. The Constitution does not authorize legislative power in any form to the Executive and Judicial Branches.
4. Article I, Section 10 of the national Constitution declares No State shall make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.
5. When the State Legislature creates law for the people, that law must be constitutionally compliant specific to the Bill of Rights or it is not valid law binding upon the people.
6. A law must be valid to exist and must exist to be lawfully enforced.
7. All elected and appointed public officials who serve the people, including you, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice, are required to take an Oath of Office to support and defend the Constitution before assuming office.
8. Any act passed by any legislature and any action committed by any public officer either supports and upholds the Constitutions, national and state, or opposes and violates them. No public officer has the constitutional authority—or any other form of valid, lawful authority—to oppose and violate the very documents to which s/he swore or affirmed his or her oath.
9. Any unconstitutional actions committed by any public officers, including you, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice, invoke the self-executing Sections 3 & 4 of the 14th Amendment, by which the errant public officers immediately vacate their offices, upon commission of their crimes, can no longer hold public office and forfeit all benefits thereof, including salary and pension.
10. Executive orders are not authorized in the national Constitution, therefore are prohibited by the national Constitution.
If you disagree with anything in this letter, then rebut, in kind, that
with which you disagree, in writing, with particularity, to me, within 30
days of this letter’s date, and support your disagreement with evidence,
fact and law. Your failure to respond, as stipulated, is your agreement
with and admission to the fact that everything in this letter is true,
correct, legal, lawful, and is your irrevocable agreement attesting to this,
fully binding upon you, in any court in America, without your protest or
objection and that of those who represent you.
All Rights Reserved,
Dr. Robert Levy
Full Printed Name, Affiant
Notary Statement
In the State of ________________
County of _________________
I swear that on this ____ day of __________________, the above named Affiant/Declarant,
_____________________, appeared before me, and, of his own free will, signed this Affidavit of Complaint.
__________________________________
Notary Public Seal:
My Commission Expires:______________ Date:
Sample
Here is a sample document you can find online.

Top of the List
The opm.gov (The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) serves as the chief human resources agency and personnel policy manager for the Federal Government.), Deep State Senior Executive Service (SES) lead America’s workforce. As the keystone of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, the SES was established to “...ensure that the executive management of the Government of the United States is responsive to the needs, policies, and goals of the Nation and otherwise is of the highest quality.” These leaders possess well-honed executive skills and share a broad perspective on government and a public service commitment that is grounded in the Constitution.
Members of the SES serve in the key positions just below the top Presidential appointees. SES members are the major link between these appointees and the rest of the Federal workforce. They operate and oversee nearly every government activity in approximately 75 Federal agencies.
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) manages the overall Federal executive personnel program, providing the day-to-day oversight and assistance to agencies as they develop, select, and manage their Federal executives.
Federal Government
Merrick B. Garland
Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington DC 20530
About the U.S. Attorneys' Offices
justice.gov/usao Charged with ensuring “that the laws be faithfully executed,” the 93 United States Attorneys work to enforce federal laws throughout the country. The President appoints a United States Attorney to each of the 94 federal districts (Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands are separate districts but share a United States Attorney). The United States Attorney is the chief federal law enforcement officer in their district and is also involved in civil litigation where the United States is a party.
Norman Wong
Acting Director, Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys
Jason R. Coody
United States Attorney North
111 North Adams Street
4th Floor U.S. Courthouse
Tallahassee, FL 32301
Roger B. Handberg
United States Attorney Middle
400 North Tampa Street
Suite 3200
Tampa, FL 33602
Markenzy Lapointe
United States Attorney South
99 N.E. 4th Street
Miami, Fl. 33132
John G. Roberts
Supreme Court of the U.S.
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Clarence Thomas
Supreme Court of the U.S.
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Samuel L. Alito
Supreme Court of the U.S.
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Sonia Sotomayor
Supreme Court of the U.S.
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Elena Kagan
Supreme Court of the U.S.
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Neil M. Gorsuch
Supreme Court of the U.S.
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Brett M. Kavanaugh
Supreme Court of the U.S.
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Amy C. Barrett
Supreme Court of the U.S.
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Ketanjl B. Jackson
Supreme Court of the U.S.
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Florida: Constitutional County Pasco
Priorities
1. Ban the microscopic tag at the county level. "Can a microscopic tag be implanted in a person's body to track his every movement? There is actual discussion about that. You will rule on that, mark my words, before your tenure is over ...
2. 1971 President Richard Nixon. "gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts"
Pasco County Sheriff
Chris Nocco
8661 Citizens Drive
New Port Richey, FL 34654
Hillsborough County Sheriff
Chad Chronister
Pinellas County Sheriff
Bob Gualtieri
10750 Ulmerton Rd.
Largo, FL 33778
Polk County Sheriff
Grady Judd Jr.
1891 Jim Keene Blvd
Winter Haven, FL 33880
Hernando County Sheriff
Al Nienhuis
18900 Cortez Blvd
Brooksville Fl 34601
Office of Governor Ron DeSantis
State of Florida
The Capitol
400 S. Monroe St.
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001
Role of the Office of the Solicitor General
As Florida’s chief appellate attorney, the Solicitor General serves the Attorney General in defending the interests of the people of Florida in state and federal court. The Office of the Solicitor General is responsible for handling the State’s most sensitive and complex litigation, supervising the State’s civil and criminal appeals, and advising the Attorney General, especially on amicus curiae matters and multi-state litigation. The Solicitor General’s staff includes eight attorneys and an administrative assistant. Aside from his duties within the Office of the Solicitor General, the Solicitor General serves as the Richard Ervin Visiting Professor at the Florida State University College of Law.
Henry Whitaker
Florida Solicitor General
Office of the Attorney General
State of Florida
PL-01, The Capitol
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
Ashley Brooke Moody
Florida Attorney General
PL-01 The Capitol
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
Joseph A. Ladapo, MD
State Surgeon General Florida Health
4052 Bald Cypress Way Tallahassee, FL 32399
EMERGENCY PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Joseph Sansone, Petitioner
27499 Riverview Center Blvd.
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Florida
Steven Meiner
Miami Beach Mayor
Miami Beach, FL
Mark Warner
Committee on Intelligence
211 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Marco Rubio
Committee on Intelligence
211 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Florida Supreme Court
Chief Justice Carlos G. Muñiz
Florida Supreme CourtAttn: Clerk's Office500 South Duval StreetTallahassee, FL 32399Justice Charles T. Canady
Justice Jorge Labarga
Justice John D. Couriel
Justice Jamie R. Grosshans
Justice Renatha Francis
Justice Meredith L. Sasso
The American Presidency Project
William McKinley
(March 4, 1897 to September 14, 1901)
John Sherman (1897-98)
William R. Day (1898)
John M. Hay (1898-1901)
Secretary of the Treasury
Lyman J. Gage (1897-1901)Secretary of War
Russel A. Alger (1897-99)Elihu Root (1899-1901)
Attorney General
Joseph McKenna (1897-98)John W. Griggs (1898-1901)
Philander C. Knox (1901)
Postmaster General
James A. Gary (1897-98)Charles Emory Smith (1898-1901)
Secretary of the Navy
John D. Long (1897-1901)Secretary of the Interior
Cornelius N. Bliss (1897-99)Ethan A. Hitchcock (1899-1901)
Secretary of Agriculture
James Wilson (1897-1901)Source potus.com/william-mckinley
Donald J. Trump
45th President of the United States
(January 20, 2017 to January 20, 2021)
Vice President: Michael R. Pence (2017-2021)
Cabinet:
Secretary of State
Rex Tillerson (2017-2018)
Michael R. Pompeo (2018-2021)
Secretary of the Treasury
Steven Mnuchin (2017-2021)
Secretary of Defense
James Mattis (2017-2018)
Mark Esper (2019-2020)
Attorney General
Jeff Sessions (2017-2018)
William P. Barr (2019-2020)
Secretary of the Interior
Ryan Zinke (2017-2019)
David Bernhardt (2019-2021)
Secretary of Agriculture
Sonny Perdue (2017-2021)
Secretary of Commerce
Wilbur Ross (2017-2021)
Secretary of Labor
Alex Acosta (2017-2019)
Eugene Scalia (2019-2021)
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Thomas E. Price (2017)
Alex M. Azar II (2018-2021)
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Ben Carson (2017-2021)
Secretary of Transportation
Elaine Chao (2017-2021)
Secretary of Energy
Rick Perry (2017-2019)
Dan Brouillette (2019-2021)
Secretary of Education
Betsy DeVos (2017-2021)
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
David Shulkin (2017-2018)
Robert L. Wilkie, Jr. (2018-2021)
Secretary of Homeland Security
John F. Kelly (2017)
Kirstjen M. Nielsen (2017-2019)
Joe Biden
46th President of the United States
(January 20, 2021 to Present)
Vice President: Kamala D. Harris (2021- )
Cabinet:
Secretary of State
Antony Blinken (2021- )
Secretary of the Treasury
Janet Yellen (2021- )
Secretary of Defense
Lloyd Austin (2021- )
Attorney General
Merrick Garland (2021- )
Secretary of the Interior
Deb Haaland (2021- )
Secretary of Agriculture
Tom Vilsack (2021- )
Secretary of Commerce
Gina Raimondo (2021- )
Secretary of Labor
Marty Walsh (2021-23)
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Xavier Becerra (2021- )
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Marcia Fudge (2021- )
Secretary of Transportation
Pete Buttigieg (2021- )
Secretary of Energy
Jennifer Granholm (2021- )
Secretary of Education
Miguel Cardona (2021- )
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Denis McDonough (2021- )
Secretary of Homeland Security
Alejandro Mayorkas (2021- )